Notes on Lukacs III: On an important difference between Lukacs and Western Hegelian Marxism.

In yesterday’s post I highlighted what I thought were important points of continuity between Lukacs and Western Hegelian Marxism. I argued there was continuity in the conception of Marxism as a method of social critique that fused Marxian notions with the Hegelian notions of totality and dialectics. I now want to emphasize a difference between Lukacs and other Western Hegelian Marxists such as the Frankfurt School.

This difference is often pointed out in a simplistic manner along the lines that Lukacs’s theory was based on class standpoint which the Frankfurt School abandoned it. A more sophisticated argument is put forward in Joe Mccarney’s Social Theory and The Crisis of Marxism On one hand Mccarney emphasizes the theoretical continuity between Marx’s and Lukacs’s standpoint of critique as the theoretical expression of the revolutionary proletariat, on the other hand Mccarney provides historical explanations for why this standpoint changed.

So what then is Lukacs standpoint as he outlines it in What Is Orthodox Marxism?
It is that the Materialist dialectic is a revolutionary dialectic.  It is a revolutionary dialectic because the “Emergence of consciousness is a ‘decisive’ historical step” and the ‘historical function of theory is to make this step a practical possibility.” Praxis and shit.

Advertisements

About HR

Deep in the adjunct crackhole.
This entry was posted in Lukacs. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s