Reconsidering Reconstruction

I have been thinking about the following passage from Werner Bonefeld’s Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy for some time:

Helmut Reichelt is right when he argues that the time has come to reconsider the purpose of reconstruction, moving it on from an attempt at finding the veritable Marx to the development of the critical themes and insights that the new reading of Marx has established as fundamental to the critique of ‘the monstrous objective power’ of economic things.

I think its quite important and given me a new way of looking at my ‘work.’ For whilst the pioneering work of the New Reading made the insufficiencies of ‘Traditional Marxism’ abundantly clear, you might say with some exaggeration, that such a distinction and the call to reconstruct a new Marx lead the New Reading to bite of more than it could chew. Not only did it become clear that the esoteric Marx was incomplete, but the enormous projects people like Postone set out for themselves likewise remain incomplete.  Yet, as Bonefeld indicates, the critical themes and insights in such a new reading are invaluable and it seems to me that one way to develop them is to re-read and adapt the complementary aspects of traditional Marxists such as Adorno, Lefebvre etc. in order to further develop the critique of political economy as a critical social theory from the perspective of the new reading.

Advertisements

About HR

Deep in the adjunct crackhole.
This entry was posted in valueformtheory, western marxism. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s