In Defense of Administered Society

Adorno’s notion of administered society is roundly criticized. Some Marxists say it posited the overcoming of the law of value. Other Marxists say it posited the overcoming of class struggles. Habermasians say it left no room for emancipatory types of reason. Finally, even those who defend Adorno say such a theory no longer applies to neoliberalism. But I think it can be defended and should be revived.

Why?

In the first place, these Marxist criticisms are overblown, the Habermasian criticism is beside the point, and the periodization criticism fails to understand ‘Keynesianism’, ‘Neoliberalism,’ and ‘Capitalism.’

In the second place, I think the theory could be fruitfully used to engage with romanticized notions of Keynesianism or social democracy.

In the third place, I think it can be revived by reading it together with Clarke’s critique of periodization and Neocleous’s ideas of the police and administration. From this perspective ‘Keynesianism’ and ‘Neoliberalism’ are both approaches to reproducing capitalism through the administration and preservation of the constitutive separation of capitalist society.

About HR

Deep in the adjunct crackhole.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s